I was recently involved in a debate on when science began. To avoid any personal bias, I turned to the Britannica Guide to the 100 Most Influential Scientists of All Time (2010), as a quick reference.
That list begins with the ancient Greeks Hippocrates (c. 460–375 BC) and Aristotle (384–322 BC), who were not really scientists in the modern sense. With the Persian Ibn Sina (980–1037) and the Englishman Roger Bacon (c. 1220–1292), however, we begin to get people thinking a little like modern scientists. As I have previouslypointedout, the basics of the scientific method were established by Dante’s time, with development accelerating in Europe after the Fourth (Italian) Renaissance.
The bar chart above plots the 100 scientists by their century of death (many of those represented by the last bar are still alive, of course, and some scientists who will take their place in the last bar are not yet born). There is probably a significant bias towards modern scientists here, but (as shown) the data nevertheless fit an exponential growth beginning in the 12th century. This is consistent with the historical record. Science, it seems, began around the 1100s, with an influx of ideas from the Muslim world. But what made the Europe of that time (the early Gothic) such fruitful soil for science?
Update: see also Why did Science begin?
- What prevents you from being awkward
- What is Capitalism and Socialism
- Did Richard Muller ever meet Stephen Hawking
- Is Alibaug worth visiting
- What is the canon of art history
- What strange addiction has affected your life
- Why arent all psychics millionaires
- Why dont quantum mechanical operators commute
- How do we avoid familiarity breeding contempt
- Will a military long distance relationship work
- What is required to clear UPSC exam
- How safe is Karachi in 2019
- Who is in the band Linkin Park
- Who opened the first self service store
- Why are people so against abstinence education
- Is life an inertia
- Which is the best diesel car 1
- What does same day mean